ISSN 2782-2346
FORMATION OF EDUCATIONAL INDEPENDENCE OF FRESHMEN USING INTERACTIVE TEACHING METHODS
Bondarev Peter B. – Candidate of Science in Philosophy; Associate Professor of the Chair of Social Work, Psychology and Pedagogy of Higher Education, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia, pbondarev@rambler.ru
Kurochkina Valentina E. – Candidate of Science in Psychology; Associate Professor of the Chair of General and Social Pedagogy, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia, kve7@rambler.ru
UDC: 37.02
The article studies the possibilities of using interactive teaching methods as an aid in developing educational independence of freshmen. Educational independence of students is considered as an ability for independent activity, fulfilled in a certain social situation of development, and for independent thinking carried out in specific conditions of educational environment of a university. In the theoretical part of the study psychological foundations for the formation of students’ educational independence such as subjective position, non-adaptive activity and goal orientation, were singled out. The main deficits of freshmen’s readiness for studying at a university are defined. Traditionally universities do not solve this problem expecting that students will manage to successfully adapt to new conditions of studying themselves. Interactive teaching methods are studied as an aid in developing educational independence of students. The influence of interactive teaching methods on development of educational independence of freshmen was approbated during the pilot study on the basis of the training course «Educational Design and Pedagogical Self-Examination», which is built with the focus on the initiative, organized and controlled learning activities of students. In the learning process, students work in intersubjective interaction: they solve cases, highlight problems, discuss hypotheses, organize brainstorming sessions, write creative papers, and develop collaborative projects. The empirical data was obtained by questioning the students who participated in the study at the stages before and after the training sessions in this discipline. As a result of the study, it was concluded that the effectiveness of interactive teaching methods for the formation of educational independence of students at the initial stage of training at the university.
Key words: educational independence of students, subjective position, non-adaptive activity, pedagogical interaction, educational process of a university, interactive education, individual educational route
For citation: Bondarev P. B., Kurochkina V. E. FORMATION OF EDUCATIONAL INDEPENDENCE OF FRESHMEN USING INTERACTIVE TEACHING METHODS. Pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Pedagogical Research. 2022;(4):166–184. (In Russ.).
References:
1. Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. Preadaptation to uncertainty as a strategy for navigation of developing systems: routes of evolution. Mobilis on the Mobili website: personality in the era of change / Under the general ed. Alexandra Asmolova. Moscow: YASK Publishing House; 2018. P. 76–101. (In Russ.).
2. Kudryavtsev V. T. The creative nature of the human psyche. Voprosy Psychologii = Questions of Psychology. 2012;(3):113-121. (In Russ.).
3. Leontiev D. A. Uncertainty as a central problem of personality psychology. Mobilis in mobiles: personality in the era of change / Under the general ed. Alexandra Asmolova. M.: YASK Publishing House; 2018. P. 40–53. (In Russ.).
4. Bondarev P. B., Kurochkina V. E. Modern pedagogical technologies for the development of educational independence of high school students. Obshchestvo: sotsiologia, psikhologia, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. 2017;(12):179-182. (In Russ.).
5. Kuzmina N. V., Chupina V. A., Zharinova E. N. Acmeological approaches to development of fundamental education. Nauchnyi dialog = Scientific Dialogue. 2015;(11(47)):212-227. (In Russ.).
6. Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. URL: http://www.oecd.org/education/2030project.
7. Sorokin P. S., Zykova A. V. «Transformative agency» as a subject of research and development in the 21st century: a review and interpretation of international experience. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnie peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021;(5):216-241. (In Russ.).
8. Zaichenko N. A. What we evaluate when we evaluate the quality of education: problems of diversity. The system for assessing the quality of education in St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg: SBI FPE «St. Petersburg Center for Quality Assessment of Education and Information Technologies»; 2018. P. 38–46. (In Russ.).
9. Pryazhnikov N. S. Problem of refusion of the concept of «profession» in changing socio-cultural realities. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational psychology and labor psychology. 2018;(3(1)):4-22. (In Russ.).
10. Godnik S. M. The process of succession of higher and secondary schools. Voronezh: Publishing House of Voronezh University; 1981. 208 p. (In Russ.).
11. Zakharova U. S., Vilkova K. A. Student agency in traditional and distance learning from their instructors’ perspective. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologia = Modern Foreign Psychology. 2020;(9(3)):87-96. (In Russ.).
12. Stupina S. B. Technologies of interactive learning in higher education: an educational and methodical manual. Saratov: Nauka; 2009. 52 p. (In Russ.).
13. Vygotsky L. S. Pedagogical Psychology. Moscow: AST [et al.]; 2005. 670 p. (In Russ.).
14. Kislyakov P. A. Ecopsychology of educational environment: design and monitoring approaches. Ekologiya cheloveka = Human Ecology. 2017;(4):42-50. (In Russ.).
15. Gushchin Yu. V. Interactive teaching methods in higher school. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo universiteta prirody, obshchestva i cheloveka «Dubna» = Dubna Psychological Journal. 2012;(2):1-12. (In Russ.).
16. Johnson D. W., Johnson R. T., Smith K. A. Active learning: Collaboration in the college classroom. Edina, Minnesota: Interaction Book Company; 1998.
17. Moon B., Vlasceanu L., Burrows L. S. (ed.). Institutional approaches to teacher education in higher education in Europe: current models and new developments. Bucharest: Editorial Encyclopedia; 2003.
